<doi_batch xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.3.1" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.3.1 https://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref5.3.1.xsd" version="5.3.1"><head><doi_batch_id>episciences.org_661_20260519090052157</doi_batch_id><timestamp>20260519090052157</timestamp><depositor><depositor_name>episciences.org</depositor_name><email_address>raphael.tournoy+crossrefapi@ccsd.cnrs.fr</email_address></depositor><registrant>episciences.org</registrant></head><body><journal><journal_metadata language="en"><full_title>JIPS - Journal d'Interaction Personne-Système</full_title><issn media_type="electronic">2418-1838</issn></journal_metadata><journal_issue><publication_date media_type="online"><month>07</month><day>22</day><year>2015</year></publication_date><journal_volume><volume>Issue 2, Special Issue: Best...</volume></journal_volume><issue>Special Issue "the best...</issue></journal_issue><journal_article publication_type="full_text" language="fr"><titles><title>Espaces d’Informations Personnelles : Utilisabilité et Modification Utilisateurs</title></titles><contributors><person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author"><given_name>Claudia</given_name><surname>Detraux</surname><affiliations><institution><institution_name>Bertin Technologies</institution_name></institution><institution><institution_name>Bertin Technologies - Aix-en-Provence</institution_name></institution></affiliations></person_name><person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author"><given_name>Dominique</given_name><surname>Scapin</surname><affiliations><institution><institution_name>Usage-centered design, analysis and improvement of information systems</institution_name></institution></affiliations></person_name></contributors><jats:abstract><jats:p xml:lang="en">This paper presents a study on the usability of a new prototype system for managing personal information on the Internet (PIMI). The objectives are to assess its ease of use, and assess user modification as an evaluation technique. Thirty users participated in the experiment: the first part was a classical usability test (TUC) and a second part was a usability test with user modifications (TUM). A total of 51 usability problems were diagnosed. Among them, 32 with TUC, and 19 with TUM. Part of the latter (11) adds to those identified with TUC, and those previously diagnosed during a usability inspection (IU with Ergonomic Criteria). The active participation of users through customization scenarios seems to provide additional clues for evaluating usability and for design (new generic usability recommendations).</jats:p><jats:p xml:lang="fr">Cet article présente une étude sur l'utilisabilité d'un nouveau prototype de système de gestion des informations personnelles sur Internet (PIMI). Les objectifs sont d'évaluer sa facilité d'utilisation, et d'évaluer la modification utilisateur comme technique d'évaluation. Trente utilisateurs ont participé à l'expérience : une première partie consistait en un test utilisateur classique (TUC) et une seconde partie était un test d'utilisabilité avec modifications utilisateur (TUM). Un total de 51 problèmes d'utilisabilité a été diagnostiqué. Parmi eux, 32 ont été identifiés avec TUC, et 19 avec TUM. Une partie de ces derniers (11) s'ajoute à ceux identifiés avec TUC, et à ceux diagnostiqués précédemment lors d'une inspection de l'utilisabilité (IU avec Critères Ergonomiques). La participation active des utilisateurs au travers de scénarios de personnalisation semble fournir des indices supplémentaires pour l'évaluation de l'utilisabilité et pour la conception (nouvelles recommandations génériques d'utilisabilité). Mots clés : Utilisabilité ; méthodes d'évaluation ; modifications utilisateur ; e-gov. ; informations personnelles. Abstract: This paper presents a study on the usability of a new prototype system for managing personal information on the Internet (PIMI). The objectives are to assess its ease of use, and assess user modification as an evaluation technique. Thirty users participated in the experiment: the first part was a classical usability test (TUC) and a second part was a usability test with user modifications (TUM). A total of 51 usability problems were diagnosed. Among them, 32 with TUC, and 19 with TUM. Part of the latter (11) adds to those identified with TUC, and those previously diagnosed during a usability inspection (IU with Ergonomic Criteria). The active participation of users through customization scenarios seems to provide additional clues for evaluating usability and for design (new generic usability recommendations).</jats:p></jats:abstract><publication_date media_type="online"><month>07</month><day>22</day><year>2015</year></publication_date><acceptance_date media_type="online"><month>07</month><day>22</day><year>2015</year></acceptance_date><publisher_item><item_number item_number_type="article_number">661</item_number></publisher_item><program xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/fundref.xsd" name="fundref"><assertion name="fundgroup"><assertion name="funder_name">French National Research Agency (ANR)</assertion><assertion name="award_number">ANR-10-VERS-0014</assertion></assertion></program><program xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" name="AccessIndicators"><free_to_read start_date="2015-07-22"/><license_ref applies_to="am" start_date="2015-07-22">https://about.hal.science/hal-authorisation-v1</license_ref><license_ref applies_to="vor" start_date="2015-07-22">https://about.hal.science/hal-authorisation-v1</license_ref><license_ref applies_to="tdm" start_date="2015-07-22">https://about.hal.science/hal-authorisation-v1</license_ref></program><program xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/relations.xsd"><related_item><intra_work_relation identifier-type="uri" relationship-type="isSameAs">https://hal.science/hal-01165326v1</intra_work_relation></related_item></program><doi_data><doi>10.46298/jips.661</doi><resource>http://jips.episciences.org/661</resource><collection property="crawler-based"><item crawler="iParadigms"><resource>https://hal.science/hal-01165326v1/document</resource></item></collection><collection property="text-mining"><item><resource mime_type="application/pdf">https://hal.science/hal-01165326v1/document</resource></item></collection></doi_data></journal_article></journal></body></doi_batch>